Public External Debt, Capital formation and Economic growth in Ethiopia        
                
  
  
    
 | Title | Public External Debt, Capital formation and Economic growth in Ethiopia |  
 | Publication Type | Journal Article |  
 | Year of Publication | 2014 |  
 | Authors | Kassu, T, Mishra, DK, Asfaw, M |  
 | Journal | Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development |  
 | Volume | 5 |  
 | Issue | 15 |  
 | ISSN | 2222-1700 |  
 | Keywords | Capital formation, Debt distress, Economic Growth, Public External Debt |  
 | Abstract | This study examined the nexus between public external debt, Capital formation and economic growth in 
economy of Ethiopia during the last recent four decades. The purpose is to identify the existence of cause and 
effect relationship between external public debt, Capital formation and Economic growth. To this end, secondary 
time serious macroeconomic data for the period under review were collected from ministry of Finance and 
Economic Development and African Development Indicators of World Bank data base and analyzed by 
qualitative description and quantitative econometric techniques. The result from qualitative and quantitative 
analysis has shown that Ethiopia were under serious external debt problem until 1990’s. Its good name was 
affected and access to external concessional borrowing window was denied. There were debt overhang, 
crowding out and liquidity problems birthed out of unfavorable policy followed by Dergue regime which include 
large borrowing from multilateral, bilateral and commercial creditors to finance war, in appropriate 
macroeconomic policy and channeling of resources for inefficient public undertakings which led to very low rate 
of return. The present government which inherited a mounting debt, fragile macro economy and very unstable 
country highly vulnerable to distress and conflict, with the help of IDA and IMF established a stable 
macroeconomic environment, adopted comprehensive debt management strategy, utilized available debt relief 
optimally, improved debt indicator ratios and brought the country’s external debt from un sustainability to 
sustainability. According to the quantitative analysis public external debt as percentage of GDP has a negative 
and significant relationship with real GDP in the long run and no significant effect in the short run. On the other 
hand external debt as percentage of GDP has positive and significant effect on capital formation in the long run 
and negative in the short run. 
 |